The Faulty Arguments Behind Australia’s Corporate Tax

Sinclair DavidsonAugust 23, 2008PM87

In Australia, the primary function of taxation is to finance government spending. Its secondary objectives relate to influencing social and economic outcomes, resource allocation, consumption patterns, the level and direction of savings, and the relative welfare of different groups. Non-distortionary taxation is not necessarily an objective of the Australian system. Australia’s corporate tax is said to be very successful, raising substantial revenue, and there has been little debate about it over the past few years. While public debate has concentrated on personal income tax, there has been little demand for corporate tax reform. Arguments by the Business Council of Australia , for example, that corporate taxes are too high have been viewed as special pleading by lobby groups. This paper investigates Australian corporate tax and highlights a number of issues that deserve greater public awareness.

Related Commentary

The mental health system may be making us sicker
Steven SchwartzApril 6, 2026CANBERRA TIMES

Australia has a mental health crisis, but not the one we think. Despite decades of...

Housing negative gearing tax
Reducing the discount would likely not have any lasting impact in lowering house prices
Robert Carling, Michael StutchburyMarch 21, 2026CANBERRA TIMES

Anyone watching the smoke signals from Canberra knows that moves are afoot to try and...

Alarm bells ringing on more interest rate pain
Michael StutchburyMarch 18, 2026DAILY TELEGRAPH
Australians were losing faith that the combination of Labor’s economic policies and the RBA monetary...

• Subscribe

Subscribe now and stay in the loop with our giving appeals, event alerts, newsletters and research updates.

We are always pleased to hear from you. If you have any questions or feedback, please contact us here: