Welfare State or Constitutional State?

Suri RatnapalaMay 3, 1990PM15

In this contribution to the CIS Social Welfare Research Program, Suri Ratnapala, Lecturer in Law at the University of Queensland, explains why the welfare state is a constant source of political conflict:

-          In Australia, the strict constitutional distinction between legislation and administration has been obliterated by the courts.

-          As a result, welfare policy is typically promoted by delegated legislation and administrative regulations that escape parliamentary scrutiny and judicial control.

-          This encourages special interests to lobby government for welfare programs that benefits them at the expense of the community.

 

Related Commentary

Religious tests a red line we shouldn’t cross
Peter KurtiJanuary 29, 2026DAILY TELEGRAPH
Morrison deserves credit for insisting accusations of Islamophobia must not shut down necessary debate. But...
It’s judgment day: time for unis to kick politics off campus
Steven SchwartzJanuary 29, 2026THE AUSTRALIAN
The problem is not academic freedom itself. The problem is that universities have forgotten what...
Fear after Bondi is putting free speech on trial
Peter KurtiJanuary 14, 2026AUSTRALIAN FINANCIAL REVIEW
Instead of rushing to add new laws to an already swollen statute book, we should...

• Subscribe

Subscribe now and stay in the loop with our giving appeals, event alerts, newsletters and research updates.

We are always pleased to hear from you. If you have any questions or feedback, please contact us here: