Compulsory Super at 20: Libertarian Paternalism’ Without the Libertarianism

Stephen KirchnerDecember 4, 2012PM132

Australia’s approach to retirement incomes policy has three pillars: means-tested age pension, compulsory superannuation, and voluntary saving.

The key issue for public policy is whether compulsory super is the best way of improving
retirement incomes and reducing future demands on the federal budget from an ageing
population compared to alternative policy measures.

Compulsory super is not well integrated with the other two pillars of retirement incomes
policy: the age pension and voluntary saving.

Addressing adverse interactions within the three pillars and between the three pillars
and the tax system is a preferable policy approach to further increases in the compulsory
contribution rate.

Related Commentary

The mental health system may be making us sicker
Steven SchwartzApril 6, 2026CANBERRA TIMES

Australia has a mental health crisis, but not the one we think. Despite decades of...

Housing negative gearing tax
Reducing the discount would likely not have any lasting impact in lowering house prices
Robert Carling, Michael StutchburyMarch 21, 2026CANBERRA TIMES

Anyone watching the smoke signals from Canberra knows that moves are afoot to try and...

Alarm bells ringing on more interest rate pain
Michael StutchburyMarch 18, 2026DAILY TELEGRAPH
Australians were losing faith that the combination of Labor’s economic policies and the RBA monetary...

• Subscribe

Subscribe now and stay in the loop with our giving appeals, event alerts, newsletters and research updates.

We are always pleased to hear from you. If you have any questions or feedback, please contact us here: