Open for Business? Australian Interests and the OECD’s Multilateral Agreement on Investment (MAI)

Wolfgang KasperApril 17, 1998IA1

This first Issue Analysis deals with the OECD’s Multilateral Agreement on Investment (MAI) which the Australian government has been helping to negotiate.

The proposed MAI will not mean a dramatic change to Australia’s current practice in controlling foreign investment. The MAI will promulgate uniform principles that will curb the scope of governments for arbitrary, case-specific interventions. The key provisions of the MAI are the application of the most-favoured-nation clause to signatories of the MAI, and the stipulation that the signatories must not discriminate between national and foreign investors, and must forswear the power to control international payments and personnel exchanges tied to border-crossing investments.

If history is any guide, these fundamental principles of the MAI will not only serve economic growth and job creation, but also help to protect the basic civil and economic liberties of Australians. The agreement may, however, limit the influence of established industrial and special-interest lobbies.

Unfortunately, four years of expert negotiation in Paris have yielded an MAI draft that does not confine itself to affirming time-tested, first-best principles. The present draft is riddled with numerous exemptions and reservations, which indicate poor institutional design. They fuzzy up the global investment rules and make them incomprehensible and untrustworthy for international investors. The primary intent of the MAI – to strengthen the confidence of international investors – is not promoted by the draft as it presently stands.

A simple and principled MAI would be in the interest of Australia, a small country with considerable untapped development opportunities. Only by providing simple and reliable rules can we attract foreign capital, knowledge and enterprise. The institutional framework of the MAI principles would promote our individual and national interests in prosperity, liberty, justice, security and peace. The Australian government should therefore work towards a simplification of the MAI draft.

Wolfgang Kasper is the Professor of Economics in the School of Economics and Management, University College, and author of Capital Xenophobia.

 

Related Commentary

The mental health system may be making us sicker
Steven SchwartzApril 6, 2026CANBERRA TIMES

Australia has a mental health crisis, but not the one we think. Despite decades of...

Housing negative gearing tax
Reducing the discount would likely not have any lasting impact in lowering house prices
Robert Carling, Michael StutchburyMarch 21, 2026CANBERRA TIMES

Anyone watching the smoke signals from Canberra knows that moves are afoot to try and...

Alarm bells ringing on more interest rate pain
Michael StutchburyMarch 18, 2026DAILY TELEGRAPH
Australians were losing faith that the combination of Labor’s economic policies and the RBA monetary...

• Subscribe

Subscribe now and stay in the loop with our giving appeals, event alerts, newsletters and research updates.

We are always pleased to hear from you. If you have any questions or feedback, please contact us here: